An anonymous ex-employee has come forward as a whistleblower, claiming Bud Light’s partnership with trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney was a strategic move to undermine the company. He also has a strong theory as to why they wanted to do this.
As Gateway Pundit readers know, the beer brand made a conscious decision in April to push Dylan Mulvaney in the face of America. Conservatives promptly launched a boycott of the beer brand, causing Bud Light sales to collapse completely over the course of several weeks.
Sales have fallen so much that the company recently lost its number one position in America to Modelo.
As the New York Post reported, the whistleblower spoke exclusive to OutKick’s Tomi Lahren and said employees were completely baffled as to why management would push the radical left’s pro-trans agenda:
Employees said they were shocked. Why would they do this? What were they thinking?’ Especially now. This is the worst, it’s like the worst time yet, the best timing yet as a company tries to change the way it operates on a corporate level.
Many of us talk about that like they planned it some way, like a strategic destruction of Bud Light.
Lahren then asked for clarification:
You’re telling me you think Bud Light knew this partnership with Dylan Mulvaney was going to be a disaster, saw it turn out to be a disaster and then almost sat back and let it happen?
“Because fueling that brand would somehow allow them to somehow rejuvenate it or revive it, reorder it?”
The former employee confirmed this and then explained that after Bud Light was bought by InBev, a Belgian brewery, they started taking advantage of the employees, ostensibly because sales were down.
When the company was acquired by InBev, a lot changed since it was owned by Anheuser-Busch. You know, it’s an American brand.
He said the company previously offered many quality benefits before being bought by InBev. The company used this as an excuse to restructure both employee benefits and corporate standards through layoffs and renegotiating contracts. He then said they knew presenting Mulvaney would get the job done.
Bud Light has been failing for years. We’ve been talking about that for years. The numbers of just, you know, getting worse little by little. And it feels like they said: let’s hammer this nail into the coffin.
Now we have a lot of layoffs, a lot of loss of production. It would be easy for them to restructure, say, pay or contracts.
So the most likely reason management put Mulvaney on Bud Light cans was to accelerate their efforts to cut costs and lay off employees. Then they could restructure the company in their own image.
In other words, old-fashioned corporate greed.